File No. 812.512/2062

The Ambassador in Mexico ( Fletcher) to the Secretary of State

No. 1273

Sir: I have the honor to confirm my telegram of yesterday1 reporting the departure of Messrs. Garfield and Rhoades for Houston, Texas, where they expect to report to their principals the results of their negotiations with the representatives of the Mexican Government with respect to the petroleum decree of February 19 last and the decrees on the same subject issued subsequently.

Before leaving, Messrs. Pani and Nieto, with the approval of President Carranza, handed them a signed memorandum embodying the interpretations and modifications of said decrees which the Mexican Government has made or will make as a result of their conferences here. I enclose copy and translation of this memorandum as published to-day.

I have been kept fully informed by Mr. Garfield of the progress of the negotiations, but have taken no part in them. Mr. Pani gave a dinner in honor of Messrs. Garfield and Rhoades the night before they left Mexico, which I attended, and after which various features of the case were discussed informally. Mr. Pani affected to think the question definitely settled. As I had not read the memorandum above mentioned, which was signed and given to them after dinner, I refrained from any except most general observations.

Messrs. Garfield and Rhoades had suggested in writing to Messrs. Pani and Nieto that the proposed new petroleum decree, which it is understood will embrace the modifications, etc., covered by the memorandum herewith, should contain as a preamble the following declarations:

That, it being necessary to unify the laws relative to the petroleum industry, in order to obtain the development and exploitation of the deposits and other similar substances in conformity with the interests of the people and of the commercial progress of the nation, and to the end of preventing a monopoly of the petroleum industry and of recognizing and assuring justly and equitably the rights legitimately acquired by the persons and associations which have, in good faith, invested capital in the development and exploitation of the industry referred to, etc.

Mr. Pani promised to study this proposal and indicated a willingness to incorporate all except the realty important part relating to [Page 746] the recognition of legitimately acquired rights, etc. But, of course, even the part he approves of may be disapproved by President Carranza. In fact, it is clear to me that the Mexican Government is not willing to yield a particle on the question of principle and that if the American companies accept the law, even as modified as per the memorandum herewith, they will yield and renounce all rights and titles which they may have heretofore acquired. The whole intent of this legislation by decree is to give effect to Article 27 of the 1917 Constitution, and the negotiations of Messrs. Garfield and Rhoades, while productive of certain clarifications in the matter of interpretation and of certain modifications in practice and taxation favorable to the interests of their clients, have not served in any way to remove the great obstacle to a definitive settlement of this question.

Mr. Garfield will proceed directly from the meeting at Houston to Washington and will report fully to the Department as to his negotiations here and the deliberations of the companies’ representatives at Houston.

I have [etc.]

Henry P. Fletcher
[Enclosure—Translation]

Official announcement of modifications to the petroleum land tax law and to the decrees of May and July1

(We publish below the memorandum which Messrs. Alberto J. Pani, Secretary of Industry, Commerce and Labor, and Rafael Nieto, Undersecretary of the Treasury and Public Credit, gave to the press, relative to the negotiations with the Mexican Government conducted by Messrs. Nelson O. Rhoades and James R. Garfield.)

Messrs. James R. Garfield and Nelson O. Rhoades, representatives of the following oil companies,

  • Huasteca Petroleum Co.,
  • Mexican Petroleum Co.,
  • Compañía Petrolera Pan-Americana,
  • Tuxpan Petroleum Co.,
  • Doheny & Bridge,
  • Chiconcillo Petroleum Co.,
  • The Texas Company of Mexico,
  • Richard E. Brooks,
  • Pánuco Transportation Co., S. A.,
  • Standard Oil Company of New Jersey,
  • Compañía Transcontinental de Petróleo, S. A.,
  • The Veracruz Mexican Oil Syndicate, Ltd.,
  • International Petroleum Co.,
  • Southern Oil & Transportation Co.,
  • Tampico Navigation Co.,
  • Scottish Mex. Oil Co.,
  • Compañía Petrolera Tal Vez, S. A.,
  • Producers Terminal Corp.
  • Pánuco Oil Co.,
  • The National Oil Co.,
  • The National Ship Co.,
  • Mexican National Oil Co.,
  • John F. Penrose,
  • Penrose & Riler,
  • Compañía Mexicana de Petróleo “El Aguila”, S. A.,
  • Island Oil & Transport,
  • Compañía Metropolitana de Oleoductos, S. A.,
  • Compañía Mexicana de Petroleo “La Libertad”, S. A.,
  • “La Atlántica”, Compañía Mexicana
  • Productora y Refinadora de Petróleo, S. A.,
  • Pánuco Boston Oil Co.,
  • Port Lobos Petroleum Corp.,
  • Cortez Oil Corp.,
  • Adrian Petroleum Co., Inc.,
  • Aguada Petroleum Corp.,
  • Victor Petroleum Corp.,
  • Penn-Mex. Fuel Oil Co.,
  • Freeport & Mexican Fuel Oil Corp.,
  • Mexican Sinclair Petroleum Corp.,
  • James A. Weir,
  • C. F. Ireland,
  • Compañía Terminal de Lobos, S. A.,
  • Mexican Gulf Oil Co.,
  • Compañía de Petróleo “La Corona”, S. A.,
  • New England Fuel Oil Co.,
  • New England,
  • Union Oil of Mexico, S. A.,
[Page 747]

have held various conferences with the undersigned, in which the following questions were discussed: The decree of February 19 last fixing taxes on oil lands and oil leases; that of May 18 this year extending the period for the presentation of the manifestations prescribed and outlining the manner in which they should be made up; and lastly, the two decrees of the 8th instant relative to the title tax and the regulations governing the denouncement of petroleum claims.

As a result of the conferences, held with Messrs. Garfield and Rhoades in representation of the oil companies listed, we the undersigned make known that the President of the Republic has approved the following interpretations and modifications with respect to the provisions of the decrees under consideration:

I. The Decree of February 19, 1918, Establishing Taxes on Oil Lands and Oil Leases

1. For the collection of the tax prescribed in Article 2 of this decree, it is understood that the rents fixed are in national gold, and if any other class of money is stipulated in leases or transfers, the same shall be reduced to national metallic gold in conformity with existing Treasury rulings.

2. The royalties referred to in Article 3 of the same decree, are the percentages of production payable by the exploiters to middlemen or landowners, in kind or in cash; or, the amount of money stipulated in the contracts as payable on each barrel (or other unit of measure) of oil extracted or produced.

When, in contracts made prior to May 1, 1917, the royalty is stipulated as payable on the basis of a specified amount of money per barrel or other unit of oil, the 50 per cent thereof payable to the Nation shall be collectible in metallic currency.

3. Independently of whether the royalties stipulated in leases are called for in kind or in cash, the Department of the Treasury and Public Credit is empowered to collect the 50 per cent of the royalties corresponding to the nation, in one or the other; it being understood, naturally, that when collection is made in kind, the exploiter’s interests will not be injured in any way.

4. Exploited claims, referred to in Article 4 of the said decree, are understood to be—with respect to the “manifestations” only—those on which there is at least one oil well producing an amount which is commercially profitable.

The royalty referred to in this article shall be calculated on actual and not on potential production.

5. The transfer transactions referred to in Article 10 of the decree under consideration, are understood to be those made after the date of promulgation of the said decree and which originate directly or indirectly from contracts entered into prior to May 1, 1917.

6. The obligation imposed by Article 11 of the decree in question, to the effect that the royalty corresponding to the nation, when payable in kind, shall be delivered at one of the exploiter’s storage tanks to be specified by the Department of the Treasury and Public Credit, has for its sole purpose that of assuring the fulfilment of the accidental requirements of the public service, without injury of any kind to the exploiter.

7. For the purposes of Article 12 of the decree of February 19, 1918, the tax value of oil at Mexican ports of shipment shall be determined by deducting from the quotations published in the stock exchange bulletin of New York, the actual transportation cost from shipping ports to New York City.

II. Decree of May 18, 1918, Extending the Period Fixed by Article 14 of the Decree of February 19 Last for the Presentation of Manifestations and Specifying the Manner of Preparing Them

8. The time limit fixed under Article 1 of this decree, within which parties interested shall present their manifestations to the Department of Industry, Commerce and Labor, is extended to the 15th of August next, inclusive.

9. The manifestations which foreign companies may present shall be received, and these companies shall have at their disposal the entire time required for denouncement procedures, for the purpose of organizing subsidiary or allied companies to which shall be granted titles to the claims denounced, thereby observing the provisions of Article 27 of the present Constitution, which expressly states that concessions for the exploitation of the natural resources of the subsoil, shall be granted only to persons or companies organized under the laws of Mexico.

[Page 748]

III. Decree of July 8, 1918, Containing Regulations Governing Article 14 of the Decree of February 19, 1918

10. The date beginning with which oil claims may be denounced on free land, to which reference is made in Article 1 of this decree, is changed also to August 15 next, inclusive. The corresponding changes of the dates stipulated in the other articles of this decree are also made, taking into account the extension of fifteen days more granted for the presentation of manifestations and for the denouncement of claims.

11. With reference to the provision in Article 6 of this decree and in a manner analogous to that indicated in Article 5, that land shall be declared to be free which may have been covered by a manifestation but which may not have been denounced by the party making the manifestation, who is entitled to preference, within two months following the date of presentation of the declaration to the Department of Industry, Commerce and Labor.

12. Article 30 shall be modified in the sense that the Department of Industry, Commerce and Labor may pardon any faults incurred by the tardy denouncer, covered by Article 26, when satisfactory proof is presented to show that such faults were due to reasons of force majeure.

13. The community lands referred to in Articles 34 and 35 of this decree, are those which up to May 1, 1917, had not been leased. Those which may have been legally leased may be denounced by the last cessionary and other middlemen, on condition that they shall previously have been covered by manifestation. Article 34 shall be modified in this sense.

14. Article 43 shall be modified as follows:

The concessionaires may at any time request a reduction in their claims; the claims of which they are relieved shall be staked off and new titles issued to cover the same, canceling the previous titles. The new titles shall not in these cases be subject to the title tax.

15. The concessionaire of a claim on ground which has not been leased, shall pay the tax prescribed in Article 4 of the decree of February 19, 1918; that is, five pesos yearly per hectare and 5 per cent of the actual production of the wells drilled within the claim, it being well understood that the rental shall be paid even though the claim is not operated.

16. A fine shall be imposed for failure to comply with the obligations prescribed in Article 47 of from 50 to 1,000 pesos, according to the gravity and frequency of the offense of non-compliance with these obligations, this without prejudice to the right of the Department of Industry, Commerce and Labor to have the land staked out and the corresponding plans made, at the expense of the concessionaire of the claim.

17. The concessionaires shall also be subject to a fine of from 50 to 1,000 pesos, depending on the condition of the claim, for failure to comply with the obligation provided for in Article 48 of this decree.

18. Article 50 shall be modified in line with the new reading of Article 43.

19. Failures to comply with the obligations covered by Articles 47 and 48, shall no longer be considered as a cause for cancelation, and such failures shall be penalized as hereinbefore indicated, when such failures are not due to reasons of force majeure, duly proven. Article 53 shall be changed in this sense.

IV. Decree of July 8, 1918, Which Adds to Fraction 101 of Article 14 of the Federal Stamp Tax Law of 1906

20. The title tax fixed by the decree stated shall be reduced to three pesos per hectare.

21. In payment of the title tax, the credits which the petroleum companies have against the Mexican Government under the loans they have made to it for the Panuco River dredging work, shall be accepted.

Mexico, the twenty-ninth day of July, one thousand nine hundred and eighteen.

Secretary of Industry, Commerce and Labor,
A. J. Pani
[rubric]
Undersecretary of the Treasury and Public Credit,
Rafael Nieto
[rubric]
  1. Not printed.
  2. El Universal, July 31, 1918.