File No. 612.119/1152

The Ambassador in Mexico ( Fletcher) to the Secretary of State

No. 844

Sir: With reference to my despatch No. 819 of March 6, forwarding Mr. Nieto’s report to President Carranza of his negotiations in the United States, I have the honor to transmit, herewith, the text and translation of an editorial published by El Pueblo, the Government organ, outlining the reasons which justified President Carranza in refusing to approve Mr. Nieto’s arrangement for gold exports.

I have [etc.]

Henry P. Fletcher
[Enclosure]

Summary of an editorial from “El Pueblo” March 14, 1918

The editorial states that it had not so far discussed the so-called Nieto agreement which was such a dismal failure, in order not to disturb the renewed discussions between Secretary for Foreign Affairs Aguilar and Ambassador Fletcher, but now it is forced to do so because of the attitude of a certain newspaper which eulogizes Nieto and promises to discuss his proposed arrangement. Before explaining the reasons for this malicious newspaper campaign, an outline is given of the reasons which justified President Carranza in refusing to sanction Nieto’s arrangement.

The outline follows:

In Clause 1, the provision that the Bank of the Mexican Republic will issue bills to be received by the Government in payment of taxes and contributions is strictly of an internal and not of an international nature. “Is this an explanation, a mandate, or a condition?”

Clause 2 is the vital point in the question.

It makes us a financial agency of the United States; our bank, according: to this, is an American institution, whose reserve funds are in the United States, and whose credit depends or the pleasure of the United States. The deposits, represented by our bills, are handled by foreign hands, and are dependent on the eventualities of our foreign affairs. These reserves are a credit in favor of Mexico—which will not see the actual money—and are funds in the possession of a distrustful and susceptible enemy who can apply them as an indemnity for any real or supposed damage, or for any other purpose.

Clause 3 condemns Mexico to a constant lack of metallic currency, which cannot be remedied until peace is ratified, and even this is subject to the course of events, because, as regards the excess over $10,000,000, “the Mexican Government desires assurances that the United States Government will not place any difficulties in the way of its exportation.” That is, the United States does not compromise itself in this respect, as the Mexican Government only desires that it be done, and the desires of one party to an agreement do not obligate the other party.

In exchange for these ten millions and the other five referred to in Clause 7, Mexico obligates herself to cancel laws which protect her metal production; Mexico can only import such gold from the United States as it pleases that Government to permit to be exported (Clause 5); and finally (Clause 6), the United States is assured that no gold exports will be made by Mexico and so reach the enemy.

Summing up: The project does not solve the problem and for fifteen millions belonging to Mexico which she is allowed to receive, Mexico is placed in a humiliating position.

Our bank is not our bank, but a branch which we are permitted to manage in an administrative way only, because its funds, which constitute its strength, are in the possession of the Federal reserve banks.

Mexico did not beg for anything. It is a question of a nation giving in exchange for what she obtains, and at present Mexico gives raw materials for the war to the Allies; that is, oil, henequen, metals, lumber, etc.