File No. 835.73/70

The Chargé in Argentina ( De Billier) to the Secretary of State

[Extract]
No. 288

Sir: Referring to the Department’s telegraphic instruction dated September 28 ultimo and to the Embassy’s telegraphic despatch dated October 6 ultimo, I have the honor to report that an Executive decree dated July 19 last and published in the Official Bulletin July 24 ordered the departmental divisions of the administration to report within thirty days on the actual status of concessions to individuals, corporations and private companies. The object of this decree was apparently to ascertain what funds deposited as a forfeit by concessionaires had lapsed to the Government by limitation.

This decree appeared to the local agent of the Central & South American Telegraph Co., Mr. Hussey, to contain an element of danger to his company’s concession of June 22, 1885. In conformity with [Page 38] the Department’s subsequent instruction I took up the matter with the Minister for Foreign Affairs by note and orally and further spoke to Doctor Aldao. … While it may be safely concluded that no action adverse to the concession will be taken now, it will be seen from the opinion of Doctor Aldao, which with translation is enclosed herewith, that the telegraph company would probably do well to take some step looking to a renewal of the concession which would contain certain stipulations as to its termination in default of active preparations for the laying of the cables contemplated.

I have [etc.]

Frederic de Billier
[Enclosure—Translation]

Aldao, Campos & del Valle to the Chargé in Argentina ( De Billier)

Dear Sir: In compliance with the request which you were pleased to make of us we examined the facts in the matter relating to the Central & South American Telegraph Co.

The concession granted to the aforesaid company by the decree of June 22, 1885, is perfectly legal, since it was established by means of a decree of the Executive power of the nation dictated in accordance with the prerogatives conferred by Article 4 of the law of national telegraphs of October 7, 1875.

As we are aware, this concession is in force; but we believe that the Executive power could annul it at will, on account of its not having been used during the 31 years which have elapsed since it was granted.

Therefore we point out that it would not be wise to rely upon the validity of the concession in future while no use is being made of it, but that it would be advisable to apply to the Executive power for a new decree, which could be obtained if the company is in position to announce that it will lay the contemplated cable within a reasonable period of time.

If, as you state is expected here, the existing difficulties in Brazil will be obviated within a few weeks, the opportunity will have arrived for the company to attempt to obtain from the Executive power the confirmation of the said concession.

Until these difficulties are removed, we think that it will not prove difficult to arrange to have the status quo of the concession maintained for a certain time, in view of the fact that the validity of the concession can not be questioned so long as the Executive power does not cancel it as a result of its not having been used during the long period of time which has elapsed since it was granted.

We consider, moreover, that it would not be difficult to arrange with the Executive power that before the concession were canceled, the company be allowed a certain time to make use of it, under penalty of cancelation if within the time so fixed the company fail to have constructed or have begun to construct the cable in question.

As you know, the present term of the Executive power ends the 12th instant, and, on this account, it is absolutely certain that some time will elapse before the new government will be able to turn its attention to this matter.

Yours [etc.]

Aldao, Campos & del Valle
By R. C. A.