131. Circular Airgram From the United States Information Agency to All Principal USIS Posts1

CA–724

SUBJECT

  • Portraying American Society to Foreign Audiences: Priority Themes

Purpose of this message is to identify themes about American society for use by Agency media and, as applicable, by individual posts. These themes are not definitive or exclusive: they do represent principal points that we want to communicate to our foreign audiences.

There is an excess of noise and information in communications today. Only if we focus our message can we hope our audiences will focus their attention on what we have to say. The foreign listener receives a myriad of facts, impressions and signals about our large and complex society. One of USIA’s chief tasks is to call attention to the fundamentals of our society and help our audiences put rapidly moving and frequently confusing day-by-day developments into perspective.

Familiar principles of communication, of course apply. We should repeat, reinforce, recapitulate; facts presented in isolation have far less impact than facts ordered explicitly and consecutively to support a well-defined theme. We must be relevant to our audiences, encouraging them to feel a sense of common endeavor with us, and speaking where possible in terms of their own experience.

Every nation has a style. The American style is movement, innovation, experiment. The vitality of American life presents an obvious magnet; we should seek to capitalize on it, particularly with younger audiences. The content and presentation of Agency media, and the atmosphere of our offices, centers and programs abroad should reinforce the image of a pioneering and dynamic nation.

Our tone, neither boastful nor defensive, should reflect our conviction and confidence.

[Page 336]

Understanding of the United States as a nation builds a base for understanding of United States policies. Specific foreign policy themes are the subject of a separate guidance.2

Shakespeare

Attachment

Paper3

Theme I

The Essence of American Institutions is Freedom

The institutions established for the American Republic two centuries ago, and modified since to meet contemporary conditions, embody the spirit of liberty. In contrast to societies which seek to repress “inimical” ideas, the American system seeks to enlist the efforts of all who would make a contribution. This ensures that new thinking confronts new problems, and that the institutions of government, based on the popular will, remain responsive.

The free circulation of dissenting opinion is basic to the American democratic process. The right of minorities to express their views by legal and non-violent means, is guaranteed. Illustrations of dissenting opinion ultimately being adopted by the majority, or becoming public policy, show democracy at work.

America’s political, economic, and social institutions seek to give maximum liberty to the individual, while providing for such governmental intervention as is necessary to insure the public interest. These institutions are subject to constant re-examination and modification, to correct weaknesses and meet changed conditions.

The continuing public debate over the nature and the functioning of our institutions is a source of strength. Through free competition of ideas comes progress.

[Page 337]
Topics: The principles of 1776 and 1789; their changing application through our history; their expression in American institutions today
Government and public concern with the environment—case history of free discussion in the U.S.
Dissent in the U.S., dissent in the USSR
American political processes: expression of diverse opinion, reconciling of diverse interests
Ferment of ideas in the American universities and media

Theme II

America is Committed to Equality of Opportunity

Equality of opportunity has been a national ideal since America’s founding as a nation. In large part, American history is the record of a continuing attempt to realize this ideal.

At the heart of the American commitment to equality of opportunity is education. Educational institutions are diversified in structure, free of centralized control, and by their nature are conducive to experiment. They have achieved both mass and quality education to a remarkable degree. Today American schools and universities are the focus of a national effort, public and private, to meet new demands brought about by rapid social change.

Each American generation has seen material advancement of the less-favored groups. While enjoying an unparalleled standard of living, the nation today is deeply aware of the minority who do not fully share in its material well-being; varied initiatives are being undertaken to help. Allocations for human resources make up the largest share of the federal budget today. Abetting these efforts of government, and the self-help endeavors of those lowest on the economic scale, business leaders are using corporate funds to train the formerly-unemployable, and give them a boost up the earning ladder.

Since World War II racial minorities have made accelerated strides, while a new principle of compensation for past disadvantage has been accepted. Through Republican and Democratic Administrations the process of mobility in American society has been furthered by court decisions, legislation and Presidential initiatives. Minorities have used peaceful demonstrations, labor union organization and the ballot to win a bigger stake in America.

[Page 338]
Topics: Minority gains: the Black revolution, new steps for Chicanos and Indians, election of minority candidates
American education gears to meet new challenges
J.O.B.S.4 and other initiatives by private enterprise to hire and train the disadvantaged
The Philadelphia Plan5

Theme III

Innovation and Creativity Mark the Arts and Sciences in Contemporary America

Vigor, experimentation and creativity mark the arts and sciences in contemporary America.

The arts in the United States are characterized by imagination, variety, innovation. Their quality has won world-wide interest and acclaim. Artists have shown a special facility for working with the materials of their modern civilization; their work expresses the contemporary American desire to probe the relationship between technology and human values. Private philanthropy, community efforts, business support and, recently, governmental assistance all help artists make their works available to a broader public.

Similar vigor and creativity are seen in the sciences. Americans have led the way in recognizing the value of research and in turning the fruits of science, through technology, into practical advances for human betterment. The American university is uniquely open-ended to Federal and State governments and the community, simultaneously serving them all while involving itself in common problems and needs. From its pioneering work in the social sciences, both theory and application, to the physical science investigations that have produced the preponderance of Nobel Prize winners, to the triumphs of the moon landings and the practical benefits of space exploration, America has charted new ground. Today she is one of the leaders in searching for a cancer cure, and in exploring the oceans for new ways of satisfying human needs for food and raw materials.

In both the arts and sciences, America has benefited from a rich variety of contributions from other cultures, and shares its own achievements with others.

[Page 339]
Topics: New American directions in the arts
Cultural centers in regional capitals—Minneapolis, Seattle, Santa Fe, Dallas, Atlanta
The electronic revolution
The moon and beyond
Earthly benefits from space exploration and cooperation
Sharing the fruits of research—space, seabeds, medicine

Theme IV

The United States is in the Forefront of a New Age

The United States is in the forefront of a new technological age, adapting to unprecedentedly rapid change. In science, industry, and social organization, America is pioneering. The forces of change, rather than the “status quo,” mark American society.

America’s very success in developing a highly productive, complex post-industrial society has resulted in new challenges to be met. Rapid technological change has inevitably brought with it tensions and dislocations in established patterns. If the past is any guide, America will seek to meet these challenges with a flexible, pragmatic approach.

Young Americans are particularly sensitive to the need to adapt the organization and forms of the social structure to accommodate the new challenges. Their idealism and energy contribute significantly to the efforts of more mature Americans in the search for constructive solutions.

There is growing realization of the need for new relationships between citizens and government. The President’s proposals to reorganize the Federal government, decentralize governmental responsibilities,6 and redistribute tax revenues are bold and far-reaching. It is too soon to predict in what form the proposals may be adopted; but there has been a strong response in Congress, among state and local officials, [Page 340] and in the nation as a whole to the idea of a re-examination of national priorities and governmental structures.

America’s size, strength, resources and dynamism in entering its post-industrial phase may seem to separate the United States from other nations. And indeed there are indications that America’s technological lead is growing rather than diminishing. But many of the new challenges which America faces are presenting themselves with only slight modifications, or to a lesser degree, in other industrialized nations. The same challenges in large measure must be faced in the future by those countries just beginning to industrialize. The need to develop new patterns of life, improve public services, find adequate sources of taxation, and combat environmental pollution are not unique to America, or even to the Northern Hemisphere. Neither can these problems be solved in isolation from America’s neighbors in the world. America welcomes international cooperation in seeking solutions.

Topics: New governmental patterns: state-federal relationships; revenue sharing; federal government reorganization
The post-industrial society as seen in the U.S.; its benefits, its challenges: examples of urbanization, environment
Technology to serve, not dehumanize, man
Constructive efforts by youth to meet challenges of modern living
Productivity of the American economy
  1. Source: National Archives, RG 306, Director’s Subject Files, 1968–1972, Entry A1–42, Box 21, PPL—General 1971. Unclassified. Drafted by Hoffman on April 19; cleared by Shakespeare, Loomis, Jenkins, Baker, Owen, and Semler; approved by White. Hoffman initialed for Shakespeare, Loomis, and Jenkins; Semler initialed for Baker and Owen. Sent to all principal USIS posts and the Consulates in Montreal and Toronto. Sent via pouch.
  2. Not found.
  3. Unclassified.
  4. Presumable reference to the National Alliance of Businessmen—Job Opportunities in the Business Sector (NAB–JOBS), a training program established during the Johnson administration.
  5. On June 27, 1969, the Department of Labor announced the implementation of the “Philadelphia Plan,” which mandated that federal contractors in the building trades in the city of Philadelphia meet goals and timetables for hiring minorities to work on federal construction projects. (Frank C. Porter, “U.S. Quotas Set to Bar Hiring Bias,” Washington Post, June 28, 1969, p. A1; Congress and the Nation, vol. III, 1969–1972, pp. 710–711)
  6. In his State of the Union address, delivered before a joint session of Congress on January 22, 1971, the President described the “six great goals” designed to restructure the U.S. Government. For the text of the address, see Public Papers: Nixon, 1971, pp. 50–58. With regards to government decentralization, Nixon asserted that the “time has now come in America to reverse the flow of power and resources from the States and communities to Washington, and start power and resources flowing back from Washington to the States and communities and, more important, to the people all across America.” (Ibid., p. 53) He indicated that he would send a series of revenue sharing proposals designed to provide states with “more money and less interference.” (Ibid., p 54) Nixon’s government reorganization proposal centered on the reduction of the current 12 Cabinet departments to 8. The Departments of State, Treasury, Defense, and Justice would remain in their current forms, while the remaining departments would be “consolidated into four: Human Resources, Community Development, Natural Resources, and Economic Development.” (Ibid., p. 56) The President asserted that the time “has come to match our structure to our purposes—to look with a fresh eye, to organize the Government by conscious, comprehensive design to meet the new needs of a new era.” (Ibid.) Congress failed to take action on the reorganization proposal contained within the State of the Union address other than to hold a series of hearings. However, Congress, in 1971, did accept a Reorganization Plan that merged federal voluntary programs, such as the Peace Corps and VISTA, into a new agency known as ACTION. (Congress and the Nation, vol. III, 1969–1972, pp. 961–963)