Mr. Foster to Mr. Bayard.
San Ildefonso, August 22, 1885. (Received September 5.)
Sir: In view of my early retirement from this mission I have for some weeks past been urging upon the Spanish Government the adjustment and repayment of the excessive cattle tax collected by the Spanish consul at Key West, Fla. After several visits to the ministry of state and comparison of tables with the chief of bureau having the subject in charge, I agreed to accept as the number of cattle upon which the tax had been paid 26,626, which was twelve less than the [Page 753] number claimed in the documents sent through the Department by Messrs. McGrew & Small, the attorneys in the case; but as there was also an approximate discrepancy between the number claimed by them and the Treasury reports, and as the concession only involved $3.60, I considered the sum too trivial to delay the final settlement.
In accordance with that agreement I am to-day in receipt of a note from the minister of state, which I inclose in copy and translation, in which he states that on 26,626 head of cattle there having been paid $10,650.40 as consular taxes, the excess to be returned amounts to $7,987.80, and that the Spanish minister in Washington has been instructed to pay that sum to the Department of State in final settlement of the claim.
To this note I have to-day made an acknowledgment of receipt with the statement that a copy thereof will be forwarded for your information, as per inclosure.
It is to be observed that only three-fourths of the amount collected is ordered to be returned, 40 cents per head having been collected, which the Spanish Government conceded was an excess of 30 cents above the amount fixed by the Spanish consular tariff of fees. Ten cents per head is retained as legally authorized by said consular tariff, which directs the collection of 10 cents tonnage dues on all shipments from the United States to Spanish ports. In accepting the sum of $7,987.80, which I regard as in the interest of the claimants, it has occurred to me that it might be considered opportune to make the statement that its acceptance is not to be regarded as a recognition of the right of Spain to collect a tonnage tax in American ports, in case you coincide in the views expressed by your predecessors.
* * * * * * *
I am, &c.,