No. 603.
Mr. Fish to Mr. Evarts.

No. 303.]

Sir: Referring to my No. 219, I have the honor to inclose herewith a copy of a circular concerning marriages, which I have issued to obviate the necessity of replying to the numerous letters addressed to the legation on the subject of the validity of marriages of citizens of the United States in Switzerland.

I may add that this circular has materially facilitated the work of the legation, and has at the same time removed some of the embarrass [Page 958] merits which the Swiss law tended to place in the way of marriages of our citizens in Switzerland. * * *

I have, &c.,

NICHOLAS FISH.
[Inclosure in No. 303.]

Circular from the legation of the United States of America at Berne, concerning marriages of citizens of the United States in Switzerland

Applications are frequently made to this legation, by the cantonal or communal authorities as well as by private individuals, for certificates as to the validity of a marriage of a citizen of the United States, performed in Switzerland; these applications are generally coupled with a request that the legation should certify that the marriage is valid according to the laws of the United States, and that it will be recognized as valid by the laws of the State or Territory from which such citizen comes.

It is not within the province of the legation to certify officially as to the laws of the different States, nor is it called upon to decide whether a marriage is valid or not. Those questions are properly within the competence of the judiciary, and the legation therefore confines itself to giving a statement of the laws of the United States concerning marriages in foreign countries, and the instructions issued to the consular officers on the subject, as follows:

Sec. 4082. Marriages in presence of any consular officer of the United States in a foreign country, between persons who would be authorized to marry if residing in the District of Columbia, shall be valid to all intents and purposes, and shall have the same effect as if solemnized within the United States. And such consular officers shall, in all cases, give to the parties married before them a certificate of such marriage, and shall send another certificate thereof to the Department of State, there to be kept; such certificates shall specify the names of the parties, their ages, places of birth, and residence.” (Revised Statutes of the United States, section 4082.)

The instructions to the consuls from the Secretary of State of the United States contain the following:

“In the District of Columbia at the time of the passage of the act, males who had arrived at the age of twenty-one years, and females who had reached the age of sixteen were held competent to marry; and every minister of the gospel appointed or ordained according to the rights or ordinances of his church, whether his residence was within the District of Columbia or not, could be licensed to perform the ceremony.” (Consular regulations, § 275.)

“The statute does not authorize the consul to perform the ceremony. It is not to be supposed that Congress intended to authorize a consul to perform the ceremony of marriage, or to countenance the doing of any act which would be or even seem to be a violation of the laws of the country in which he resides. Marriage is a contract which each State regulates for itself by its own laws. Inasmuch as rights of inheritance may depend upon the validity of marriages, consuls cannot be too cautious in satisfying themselves, when their presence is asked at a proposed marriage, not only that the parties may lawfully intermarry according to the laws of the country in which the ceremony is to take place, but also that all requirements of law necessary to give vidality to the marriage have been had. In no case should the consul himself assume to perform the ceremony, unless authorized by the laws of the country to do so. The statute contemplates that the ceremony is to be performed in his presence, but it should be done according to local laws. These considerations, however, do not apply to oriental countries, such as China, Japan, Turkey, &c.” (Consular regulations, § 278.)

From examination of the above it appears that a marriage performed under, and in accordance with the Swiss Federal law, concernant l’êtat-civil, la tenue des registres qui s’y rapportent et le mariage, of December 24, 1874, if performed in the presence of a consular officer of the United States, will be valid to all intents and purposes, and shall have the same effect as if solemnized within the United States.

The legation cannot undertake to procure certificates as to the laws of the different States or Territories (each of which has its own laws on marriage, divorce, and the rights of married women). Persons desiring such certificates should apply to the-proper officials of such States or Territories, either direct, or in the case of Swiss citizens through the officials of their own country.


NICHOLAS FISH,
Chargé d’ Affaires of the United States to the Swiss Confederation.

To —— ——,
—— ——.