Historical Documents - Office of the Historian

Appendix.

contents.

[3] A.
Articles of the treaty relating to the commission.

[undated]

[4] B.
Rules of the commission.

[undated]

[5] C.—Schedule of claims presented to the commission by claimants against the respective governments, with indexes to same.

[undated]

[6] D.
Final award of commission.

Office of the Mixed Commission on
British and American Claims,
Under the Treaty May 8, 1871,
Newport, R. I., September 25, 1873.

[7] E.
Dissenting opinion of Mr. Commissioner Frazer in the Calcutta saltpetre cases. (See p. 49, ante.)

[undated]

[8] F.
Mr. Commissioner Frazer’s dissenting opinion in the case of Henry Henderson vs. United States. No. 410. See p. 49, ante.

[undated]

[9] G.
Opinion of Mr. Commissioner Frazer in abandoned and captured property cases, No. 225, and others. (See p. 49, ante.)

[undated]

[10] H.
Opinion of Mr. Commissioner Frazer in the case of John R. Hanna, vs. The United States, No. 2. (See p. 58, ante.)

[undated]

[11] I.
Mr. Commissioner Frazer’s dissenting opinion in the cases of Mrs. Sherman, No. 359, and Mrs. Brain, No. 447. (See p. 62, ante.)

[undated]

[12] K.
Opinion of Mr. Commissioner Frazer in the case of John C. Rahming, No. 7. (See p. 64, ante.)

[undated]

[13] L.
Opinion of Mr. Commissioner Frazer on the effect of failure of claimants to take and prosecute appeals in prize cases. (See p. 90, ante.)

[undated]

[14] M.
Mr. Commissioner Frazer’s opinion in the “Rio Grande” cases. (See p. 110, ante.)

[undated]

[15] N.
Dissenting opinion of Mr. Commissioner Frazer in the case of the Circassian, Nos. 432, 433, and 444. (See p. 148, ante.)

[undated]

[16] O.
Opinion of Mr. Commissioner Frazer in the cases of the Boyne, the Monmouth, and the Hilja, Nos. 216, 315, and 467. (See p. 153, ante.)

[undated]