No. 125.
Mr. Bancroft to Mr. Fish.

No. 408.]

Sir: The death of Mr. Seward has been very generally noticed in the German papers, and great respect has been shown to his memory. The tone of the papers has been marked by good will toward our country, and a full tribute has been paid to the recent successes of our diplomacy. I inclose to you the notice from the “Spener’sche Zeitung,” a journal that stands in favor with the present government and is thought to enjoy its confidence.

For myself, I stood in no very near relations to Mr. Seward until I received the appointment to Berlin. It is due to his memory to say that I found in him always, as head of the Department, friendly support, unlimited confidence, a just conception of European political relations, and a readiness under all circumstances to do justice and to promote the best relations between Germany and the United States.

I remain, &c.

GEO. BANCROFT.
[Translation from the Spener’sche Zeitung, Berlin, October 15, 1872.]

WILLIAM H. SEWARD.

We have already referred to the departed transatlantic statesman in our daily summary. The greatness of the man, however, demands a more extended notice than can he given in the limited space of a summary, and we therefore give one here.

We have briefly alluded to the principal events of his life. He was, on his father’s side, of Welsh, and on his mother’s side of Irish descent, and was therefore, notwithstanding his Anglo-Saxon name, of purely Celtic extraction. His physical exterior gave no indications of this fact. Acute understanding, political consistency, and unyielding intrepidity are not the characteristics by which this in other respects highly gifted Celtic race has distinguished itself in history. Precisely these qualities were possessed by Mr. Seward in an eminent degree. While a boy he spent six months at an institute in Georgia, and the brief insight which he there gained of life in the slave States decided the political course of his whole life. Thenceforth he was an earnest abolitionist. While governor of the State of New York, to which office he was elected in the year 1838, he settled this question so far as he was concerned. He resolutely refused the surrender of two sailors who were supposed to have aided fugitive slaves in making their escape, and, in an official document, boldly declared the act with which they were charged to be a praiseworthy one. On retiring from his office as governor, he entered the arena of Federal politics. In the year 1844 he supported Henry Clay, the unsuccessful candidate for the presidency, and in 1848 General Taylor, the successful candidate. Finally, in the year 1849, he was elected to the Senate of the United States by an immense majority. He immediately began the great struggle against slavery, which was destined to lead, through streams of blood to the removal of this cancer, which was consuming the vitals of the United States. The struggle began with a dispute concerning the Territories which had been annexed to the United States. The South wished to have slavery introduced by law into these Territories; the North objected Seward fought in the front rank of the abolition party. It was from his; lips that the well-known declaration then fell, that the question at issue was whether slavery was to be extended over the whole Union or was to be abolished everywhere in its territory. In the year 1852 Seward supported General Scott, and in the year 1856 Fremont, for the Presidency. Finally, in May, 1860, at the republican convention held at Chicago, he received, on the first ballot, 173 votes; the largest number received by any of the rival candidates was 102, which gave Seward a plurality of 71 votes. A [Page 274] plurality, however, was not sufficient for a nomination by the party; a clear majority was required; and, as he was vigorously opposed by Horace Greeley, the editor of the influential New York Tribune, Lincoln, his strongest competitor, received the necessary majority through the change of a very few votes after the third ballot. Seward nobly withdrew, and worked with untiring zeal for his successful rival, who, in the following autumn, was chosen President by the vote of the whole people. With a proper appreciation of his merits, Lincoln then selected his self-sacrificing friend as his minister of foreign affairs.

The early days of the term of the new Secretary of State were dark ones. “The United States for freedom, and America for the Americans,” had been the motto of his political career, and now for years he saw the militia of the North fly before the warlike cavaliers of the slave States, saw the Union apparently hopelessly disrupted, and, finally, saw a French army on the soil of the American continent. The famous Monroe doctrine could certainly not have been more contemptuously set at naught than by the establishment of a Mexican empire, with a European prince, under the protection of European bayonets. Seward bided his time. Once, in the well-known Trent case, he allowed himself to be so far carried away as to give England an opportunity to interfere in the contest. In his first note addressed to the London cabinet he very vigorously defended the search of the British steamer which had been made for the purpose of arresting the envoys of the rebel States. Subsequent reflection, however, induced him to yield this point, and he gave all desired satisfaction to the English government. The passionate Secretary of State took revenge on England in a speech, in which he referred to the annexation of Canada to the United States as a simple question of time. Meantime the affairs of the war began to take a turn. At the moment of the greatest military triumphs of the South, Seward extorted from the hesitating Lincoln the decree which irrevocably banished slavery from the entire territory of the Union, and thereby gave the death-blow to the warlike southern confederacy. Being thenceforth obliged to hold its slave population in check, the South succumbed at last, after a glorious resistance. The vanquished slave-party, however, at once raised the dagger of the assassin. Lincoln was murdered in the theater, and Seward, who lay ill in bed, was severely wounded in the face and neck, while one of his sons was killed in pursuing the assailant. Contrary to the expectation of his physicians, he recovered from his wounds, although now sixty-four years of age; and now commenced an era of political success for him.

Seward had hitherto shown himself a passionate and energetic partisan; he now showed himself a statesman. In the contest between Congress and the new President, Johnson, he resolutely took the part of the latter, who, while making many mistakes, was yet earnestly laboring for the reconciliation of the conquered South, and did not wish to abandon it to the partisan bitterness of the fanatical population of the North. The result justified his course; Johnson was acquitted by the Congress before which he had been impeached. Still more decided was Seward’s triumph in foreign politics. In the autumn of 1865 the new Mexican empire seemed firmly established; then it was that the American Secretary of State first found time to give this subject his attention. A brief exchange of notes with France sufficed to shake the Mexican empire to its foundations, to drive the hitherto victorious French array, demoralized and decimated, home, and to bring about, for the unfortunate Emperor Maximilian, the catastrophe of Queretaro. The Monroe doctrine had been fully vindicated by a bloody example. Seward also lived to see the humiliation of England before America, although then no longer in the active service of his country. He saw England found guilty and sentenced to make due reparation by the Geneva court of arbitration. A few weeks after this he laid his weary head to rest.

The departed American statesman belonged to a class of politicians scarcely represented in the American politics of to-day. He was a man of high principle, who knew something higher than the use of the public resources for private and party purposes. In ardent energy and unflinching intrepidity, he resembled one of those mighty statesmen who stood by the cradle of the American Republic. He therefore deserved, in the midst of smaller contemporaries, to free the great republic of the West from the stigma of slavery, as he gloriously did, after a most obstinate struggle.