Mr. Adams to Mr. Seward

No. 1046.]

Sir: The note which I have prepared in reply to Lord Russell, as mentioned in my despatches Nos. 1042 and 1043, of the 7th and 8th instant, has drawn into such length that I shall be unable to forward a copy of it to you by this steamer. Inasmuch as the historical part of the controversy was elicited in the first instance by references of my own, I have thought it important that it should not be left obscure on the record. If, in taking this latitude, I should appear heretofore to have trenched a little upon the line of your indulgence, I trust that a period will be put to it henceforward. I had hoped that the epoch of voluminous notes had passed by in this legation, at least for my time.

In connexion with this subject, I transmit herewith a copy of the London Times of Monday, the 11th instant, containing a leader relating to the depredations of the Shenandoah.

It is quite clear to me that this is prompted by uneasiness in high quarters respecting the new consequences that are perpetually developing themselves from the original mistake in policy.

I have the honor to be, sir, your obedient servant,

CHARLES FRANCIS ADAMS.

Hon. William H. Seward,Secretary of State, Washington, D. C.

[Untitled]

It is impossible not to share the indignation so loudly expressed on the other side of the Atlantic at the continued depredations of the Shenandoah on the northwest coast of America. Several months have now elapsed since the American war terminated de facto. No formal treaty of peace was executed by the confederate government, for the simple reason that all its leading members were either captives or fugitives; but the generals had signed capitulations, the armies were disbanded, the only existing civil authorities had taken the oath of allegiance to the United States, and the most influential citizens in the south were suing for pardon. Yet so lately as the end of June, and when the surrender of Generals Johnston and Taylor was already known throughout the ports of the Pacific, Captain Waddell was still burning and plundering American merchantmen in the name of the Confederate States. It appears from accounts published in the San Francisco press that, although in possession of full reports, he professed to disbelieve the ruin of the confederacy, on the ground that he had [Page 550] no information of it except from northern papers. It remains to be seen how far this plea will avail him if he should be overhauled by a war vessel of the United States. In the mean time the utter illegality of his proceedings can admit of no dispute. From the moment that peace is concluded between the two belligerent power all acts of hostility are prima facie wrongful, and this rule applies a fortiori where the one is so prostrated as to be incapable of making any conditions. Had the confederate government been in a position to enter into regular negotiations, some date would, no doubt, have been fixed after which all captures by land or sea should be null and void. As it was, that government suddenly ceased to exist, and thenceforth all persons claiming to act in obedience to its orders were left to carry on war or make their submission on their own responsibility. Captain Waddell has thought proper to adopt the former alternative, and he has done so at his peril. Unless he can show that he had neither actual nor constructive knowledge of what was known to every one else in the same latitudes and discredited by himself, he has no claim to mercy. It would be absurd in such a case to entertain the questions raised by jurists as to whether there must be an official notification of a peace, and whether an individual can be responsible for ignoring a peace of which he is technically ignorant. The commander of a vessel like the Shenandoah carries his life in his hand; his enterprise, at the best, is only distinguished from piracy so far and so longas it is authorized by a sovereign or, at least, belligerent state. If he chooses to prolong his cruise after being positively informed of facts which make his commission waste-paper, and render him a subject of the United States, he can expect no presumptions to be made in his favor.

There is every reason to fear that the ravages committed by the Shenandoah since the close of the war have been far more destructive than before. Towards the end of July a vessel called the Milo reached the harbor of San Francisco, having on board the crews of several American whalers pillaged and set on fire by this privateer. On the 1st of August another vessel called the General Pike arrived at the same port with a similar freight, bringing still more disastrous news. The Milo had left the Shenandoah on the 23d of June near the entrance of the gulf of Anadyr, on the northeast of Siberia, where, a number of whalers were then lying. Two officers belonging to the ship Abigail, then on the point of falling into Captain Waddell’s hands, had managed to get away in a fog, and to warn these vessels in the gulf. They at once ought safety among fields of ice where the Shenandoah, could not follow them, and most of them are believed to have escaped. Thus baffled, Captain Waddell destroyed the Abigail and three other ships with which he fell in soon afterwards, and proceeded towards Behring’s Straits. It is said that about eighty whalers, comprising nearly the whole Arctic fleet, were cruising in those seas, and twelve or fourteen were known to have been captured or destroyed when the mail left San Francisco. The General Pike was one of the first overtaken, and the crews of six or seven others were forthwith put on board of her, to be carried back to San Francisco. No less than two hundred and fifty-two persons were crowded into this small bark, of which the ordinary crew did not exceed thirty, and if her master is to be believed, nothing could be more brutal than Captain Waddell’s language and behavior towards his prisoners. When the General Pike quitted the Shenandoah the latter was steering in pursuit of other whalers, and on the 3d of August intelligence reached San Francisco that nine more vessels had been destroyed since her departure. In fact, there was little hope that any considerable part of the whaling fleet would succeed in making good their escape. Ships of this class are not built for speed, and a single war steamer may pounce upon them one after another with perfect ease and impunity.

It is sad to read of such wanton and vindictive devastation, and we can make great allowance for the exasperation of the shipping interest in California. It is, perhaps, natural that their resentment should betray itself in bitter allusions to the alleged complicity of this country with the evil deeds of the Shenandoah. “The English pirate,” “the English thief,” “the English pirate, thief, or robber Sea King, called Shenandoah”—such are the titles which the unhappy mates and captains of the captured vessels apply to the spoiler. This is not the time to revive the wearisome controversy on the original equipment of the Alabama and her consorts. Whether or not they ever acquired a lawful national character under the commission of President Davis, and whatever may be thought of the privileges conceded to them in British and French ports, they have now lost both the one and the other. The Shenandoah is absolutely excluded from shelter in any part of our dominions, and lest Lord Russell’s circular should not have reached Vancouver’s island, the British consul at San Francisco, with praiseworthy forethought, telegraphed the substance of it to the governor of that colony. This is all that can strictly be required of us by international law, but it may be worth considering whether a further step would not be justified under the peculiar circumstances of the case. Our neutrality, with its very limited rights” and very onerous “duties,” has ceased with the war, and nothing remains but our obligations, legal and moral, towards a friendly power in time of peace. We have amply satisfied the requirements of honor as between ourselves and the now extinct confederate government, and there is no longer room for the exercise of impartiality. There is no such thing as a “confederate steamer Shenandoah,” for there is no belligerent power to claim her or to be responsible for any enormities that she may perpetrate. Captain Waddell is, to all intents and purposes, his own master, and has the absolute disposal of all the plunder which he may accumulate. In other words, he is engaged in a private buccaneering raid, and has thereby made himself the enemy of all civilized [Page 551] nations He may have had good reasons of his own for sparing British merchantmen, but there is no good reason that we can see why he should be spared rather than any other pirate if he should chance to fall in with a British man-of-war. It was not his respect for English hospitality, but the vigilance of the colonial government, that alone prevented a gross breach of our laws when the Shenandoah lay in Australian waters. Justice and policy alike suggest that we should aid the United States in cutting short his lawless career, and putting down outrages so ruinous to commerce and so disgraceful to civilization. We hope that instructions to that effect may be sent to the commander of our squadron in the Pacific. It is an act that would be appreciated by the United States and justified by public opinion in Great Britain. Nothing but the direst necessity could excuse the system of condemning and burning ships on the high seas adopted by the confederate cruisers during the war. So strong was the feeling against it in this country that many people could never be induced to believe that it was tolerated by international law. As now practiced by Captain Waddell in flagrant defiance of all law, it can excite nothing but horror, and the circumstance of the Shenandoah being launched from our own shores, after all our efforts to maintain the spirit of the foreign enlistment act, will certainly not win for her any exceptional sympathy.