Lord Lyons to Mr. Seward.

Sir: I have the honor to transmit to you a copy of a despatch from her Majesty’s consul at New York, pointing out certain irregularities in the proceedings in the case of the British schooner Nymph, Alexander McCoppin master, and requesting that the United States government may be moved to retain the proceeds of the sale of the vessel and cargo, so as to allow time for the owners to defend their interests. This request appears to me to be reasonable, and I beg leave to recommend it to prompt and favorable consideration.

I have the honor to be, with the highest consideration, sir, your most obedient, humble servant,

LYONS.

Hon. William H. Seward, &c., &c., &c.

Mr. Archibald to Lord Lyons.

My Lord: Referring to my despatch of the 28th ultimo, reporting the discharge of Alexander McCoppin from Fort Warren, I have the honor to bring under your lordship’s notice the proceedings which have taken place in reference to the condemnation of the schooner Nymph, of which Mr. McCoppin was master.

This vessel was seized off Matagorda bay, on the coast of Texas, on the 22d April last, while on a voyage from Belize, Honduras, to Matamoras, and was taken to New Orleans, where, although there was no prize court at the time [Page 588] established there, the vessel and cargo were sold—the vessel for the sum of two thousand one hundred and twenty-five dollars, and the cargo for three thousand seven hundred and forty-one dollars and fifty-nine cents—-and the proceeds were sent to either the Navy or Treasury Department at Washington.

The papers found on board the vessel were brought to New York, and proceedings instituted in the prize court here, under which a decree, by default of condemnation of vessel and cargo, was entered on the 27th of October last, sixty days being given for furthers proof and to allow the real owners to intervene. That time having expired, and no one having intervened, a final decree of distribution will, I understand, be entered in a few days.

I beg leave to submit to your lordship that the proceedings in this case, are, as it appears to me, irregular, and the decree of condemnation ought to be set aside; at all events the proceeds in the hands of the government ought not to be distributed until time can be had for a review of the proceedings in the case, for which purpose Mr. McCoppin has placed the matter in the hands of the consul.

It seems to be repugnant to justice, and at variance with ordinary notions of the grounds of a decree in rem, to allow a condemnation where the res itself has never been subjected to the process of the court nor brought within its jurisdiction. In this case no monition was served on the master, or on any part of the effects condemned, which, as I have said, were not within the reach of the court. A publication of notice of the libel in one of the local newspapers, as I am informed, took place, which, under the act in reference to proceedings in the prize court, might perhaps have availed if the res in question were within their jurisdiction, and on this proceeding the decree by default was founded.

The proceedings in the prize court do not appear until recently to have become known to any parties interested in the vessel and cargo. The owner of the vessel, it is stated, died many months since. Mr. McCoppin, the master of the vessel, was confined in prison, first here, and afterwards at Fort Warren, for the greater part of the year. Neither the vessel nor any part of the cargo being brought to this port, the proceedings in the case escaped my notice, and consequently the name of the vessel will not be found in the list of British prize vessels condemned in this district, which I recently forwarded to your lordship.

Mr. McCoppin insists that the voyage in which the Nymph was captured was honest and bona fide, and that her destination was Matamoras, and no other port, the vessel having been driven a little out of her course at the time she was fallen in with and captured. He is now about to return to Belize to collect the necessary evidence to sustain the claim of the owners to restitution, and in the mean time it is but just, under the circumstances, that the proceeds in the hands of the government should not be distributed.

I have, &c.,

E. M. ARCHIBALD.

Lord Lyons, &c., &c., &c.