Lord Lyons to Mr. Seward.

Sir: With reference to your notes, dated the 18th and 26th ultimo, I have the honor to transmit to you extracts from a letter addressed to me by Mr. James MacHugh, and to lay before you an original affidavit showing him to be a native-born British subject.

You will perceive that Mr. MacHugh denies that “he was domiciled, residing, and pursuing mercantile business in Savannah when the insurrection broke out;” and you will observe that he states that he was arrested on landing from, not in the act of sailing by, the steamer “City of Washington,” and affirms that no newspapers or letters or contraband articles were found upon him, and that it appeared, on investigation, that the bundle of letters supposed to have been in his possession, were in fact taken from another person.

I request you to be so good as to send the original certificate back to me.

I have the honor to be, with the highest consideration, your most obedient humble servant,

LYONS.

Hon. William H. Seward, &c., &c., &c.

[Untitled]

I avail myself of the earliest possible opportunity to reply categorically to the charges made against me communicated by your lordship to her Britannic Majesty’s consul, recently laid before me, consisting of extract and copy of two letters of mine and summary of Mr. Seward, Secretary of State of this government, on the same and other charges respecting that addressed to Mr. Gray, written at Belfast, and addressed to Mr. Gray, Queenstown, Ireland. I claim as a British subject the right to communicate with any one in her Majesty’s dominions on any subject not in violation of her Majesty’s proclamation and the laws of Great Britain, and as the transaction referred to about Mr. McCoy simply applies to a contemplated appointment by a Governor Brown, through the influence of Mr: Gray, one of whom is at present a belligerent with the United States, and the other, Gray’s,” nationality being unknown to me, it is difficult to conceive in what way I have forfeited my right as a British subject, or come under the jurisdiction of the United States authorities for that act; neither am I aware that a commercial recommendation to buy or sell any shares, stocks or bonds, which are openly negotiated on every exchange in Europe, (as are also the United States securities,) constitutes an offence punishable by law in either of the belligerent States, if effected or “recommended to be effected” in a neutral country. The same remarks apply equally to the sale of a steamer or steamers referred to in my letter to a Mr. Lamar at Liverpool, at a price I am justified in selling to any buyer, whether confederate, United States subjects, or Chinese.

[Page 534]

As a matter of course, the defeat of Rosecrans or the fall of Vicksburg, alluded to in one and the other communications, affect commercially the value of the bonds or steamers to be traded in, and, as such, only enlist my expressed sympathies, as they would have done in the reverse sense, had I been interested in greenbacks or other United States securities. I beg leave to represent that I am a British subject, born in Ireland; also, “that I was not domiciled, resident, or pursuing mercantile business in Savannah when the insurrection broke out.” I joined the house of John Treanors in May, 1861, and left in June, 1861; and his being a so-called insurgent in noways justifies the application of the same term to myself. I was a passenger on board the steamer Bermuda, bound from Bermuda to Nassau, and captured off Abaco light, while steering for the latter port, and not, as asserted, taken when attempting to run the blockade. We were brought into Philadelphia in May, 1862, and I left New York in the following September for Europe, where I have been until my return here on the 18th December, 1863, when on my landing at the revenue office, where my baggage was examined, and I was arrested. I was arrested on landing from, “and not in the act of sailing by the City of Washington.”

Respecting the capture of the Bermuda, I have nothing to say, that being a matter for the decision of the prize courts; but I do not see what on earth I have to do with the various agencies of the shipping agents, Frazer, Trenholm & Co., or the nationality, insurrectionary qualities, or birth-place of her commander. I was discharged in Philadelphia as a neutral subject proceeding to Savannah by the only probable means of reaching the place, and I have not before heard it alleged, that being a passenger from one English colonial port to another, even with a view to enter a blockaded port thereafter, constituted an act of hostility to one of two belligerent States. It is also avowedly in legislation, that any one having been discharged, as he was entitled to be in such a case in May, 1862, should be rearrested and reproceeded against for the same offence nineteen months afterwards on his return to this country from Europe on totally different business.

My arrest, as before stated, took place on the arrival of the City of Washington, and not, as stated, on my intended departure, and no papers or letters or contraband were found about me. I was therefore naturally surprised, when examined by the military commission sent down here to investigate the cases of arbitrary arrests in this fort, to find myself charged with being carrier of a bundle of letters, which Mr. Seward alludes to in rather severe terms, and addressed by disloyal citizens in Baltimore, to officers in the service of the so-called Confederate States, on examining which, they proved to be those which had been taken from the person of Lieutenant Rooke, of her Britannic Majesty’s service, now here, and, on inquiry, they were identified by him.

The last item on which stress is laid is having in my possession sundry photographs of so-called insurgents, which Mr. Seward claims “to be illustrations of, and devotion to, and habitual association with the same.” If this be so, there must be an immense amount thereof in all the fancy stores of this city, where they were purchased.

[Untitled]

To all to whom these presents shall come, greeting :

I, John Young, consul of the United States of America, for the port of Belfast, (Ireland,) and its dependencies, do certify and make known, to whom these presents shall come, that John Lytle is mayor of Belfast, and that his signature to the annexed document is genuine.


JOHN YOUNG, United States Consul.
[Page 535]

We, the undersigned, residents of Belfast, county of Antrim, Ireland, being duly sworn, declare and say that we are acquainted with James McHugh; that he was born in county of Tyrone, Ireland, about or in the year 1838; that he went to the United States of America on Wednesday, the 4th day of December, 1863, and that we know him to be a British subject.

HUGH C. CLARKE.

JAMES KAVANAUGH.

JOHN LYTLE. Mayor of Belfast.