Mr. Adams to Mr. Seward.
Sir. * * * * * * * *
In regard to the notice sent to me in your No. 883, of the 22d March, of the spurious character of the paper called Mr. Mallory’s report, I lost no time in giving the information to Lord Russell. I had had some conversation with him on the subject on Saturday last, and was aware that the crown lawyers were anxious to be assured upon the subject. I therefore addressed a note to his lordship, which appears to have come just in time to clear him from an embarrassment prepared for him in the House of Lords by Lord Clanricarde. I send a copy of my note, as well as a report of the debate in the London Times.
* * * * * * * * *
I know nothing directly from Lord Russell of the correctness of the statement made by Lord Olanricarde respecting the despatch of a steamer to open a communication with the rebel authorities at Richmond. I find in the newspaper called the Index an affirmation that the steamer Petrel had been actually sent with Mr. Crawford, the consul at Havana, and that admission had been refused to him by the naval blockading authority without specific instructions from Washington. If this be true, you probably know all about it. The selection of so well-known a sympathizer as Mr. Crawford cannot be regarded as auspicious of any very stern remonstrances against the outrageous proceedings of the rebels. If it be true that he has carried the spurious report of Mr. Mallory as [Page 568] his main ground of objection, as Lord Russell appears to intimate, the turn which will be given to the whole proceeding may be readily foreseen.
I have the honor to be, sir, your obedient servant,
Hon. Willtam H. Seward, Secretary of State, Washington, D. C.,