[Extracts ]

Mr. Adams to Mr. Seward.

No. 406.]

Sir: The correspondence referred to in my despatch No. 396, of the 30th of April, has been since closed by an exchange of notes, copies of which are now transmitted. * * * * * * * *

I do not know with whom rests the responsibility for the delay in the delivery of my notes, as mentioned by his lordship. I have taken measures to fix the date at which they pass out of my hands at the foreign office.

I have the honor to be, sir, your obedient servant,

CHARLES FRANCIS ADAMS.

Hon. William H. Seward, &c., &c.

[Enclosures.]

1. Lord Russell to Mr. Adams, May 1, 1863.

2. Mr. Adams to Lord Russell, May 2, 1863.

Lord Russell to Mr. Adams.

Sir: Your letter of the 25th of April, in reply to mine of the 20th of that month, did not reach me until the morning of the 28th. I mention this to explain to you why it was not included in the collection of papers presented to Parliament on the 27th, of which my letter formed a part.

I think it necessary, in consequence of the tenor of your letter, to point out to you that you have entirely misapprehended the purport of my letter of the 20th of April. My object in that letter was not to discuss the question of the practice of nations to admit into their naval or military service the subjects or citizens of other states, but merely to point out that the government of the United States had no right to complain, as of an unfriendly act on the part of this country, that British subjects took service with the so-called Confederate States, so long as the government of the United States allowed and encouraged other British subjects to enter into their own military service.

The government of the United States must either proceed on the principle of admitting all British subjects to voluntary service in its ships and military [Page 287] bodies, and then it has no reason to complain that the confederates do the same; or it must appeal to the foreign enlistment act, and, in that case, it ought not to encourage in its own practice that which it denounces in the case of the confederates.

The government of the United States cannot ask the British government to act partially and unfairly. If thousands of British subjects are to be found fighting in the ranks of the federals, on the invitation of the United States authorities, it is no breach of neutrality that some hundreds should be found in the ships and armies of the confederates upon a similar invitation on their part.

I have the honor to be, with the highest consideration, sir, your most obedient, humble servant,

RUSSELL.

Charles Francis Adams, Esq., &c., &c.

Mr. Adams to Lord Russell.

My Lord: I am very happy to understand, by the terms of your lordship’s note of the 1st instant, what I did not doubt must have been the fact, that no intention was entertained on the part of her Majesty’s government to put obstacles in the way of remonstrances on the part of my government against the enlistment, by parties within this kingdom, of her Majesty’s subjects, for the purpose and with the intent to carry on war against a nation with which she is at peace. It has seemed to me that such proceedings have been and are carried on, in violation of the neutrality declared in the present contest, and to that extent become just subjects of complaint on my part. I am not aware that I have ever carried my representations beyond that point.

I pray your lordship to accept the assurances of the highest consideration with which I have the honor to be, my lord, your most obedient servant,

CHARLES FRANCIS ADAMS.

Right Hon. Earl Russell, &c., &c.