851G.00/8–1746: Telegram
The Consul at Saigon (Reed) to the Secretary of State
[Received August 18—2:53 a.m.]
342. At Dalat conference, which closed on 14th, delegations were reasonably unanimous as to desired structure and scope of federation and relationship of member states with federation and each other. Cochin-Chinese delegations vowed [delegation showed] more independence of thought than other delegations and followed less slavishly French pattern for Indochina of future. This is part to impress Cochin-Chinese and to help lessen belief present Cochin-Chinese Govt only a puppet, but as previously reported members of this govt sincerely want more freedom of action and less domination by French. While findings and recommendations of conference not binding they appear to be reasonable basis for future, but it is certain Viet Nam will find much fault therewith, as they fall short of the larger degree of independence desired by that state. Growing belief High Commissioner and Commissioner for Cochin-China57 may go as their policy subjected increasing criticism here and reportedly in France, particularly in calling Dalat conference knowing Viet Nam could object and in creating Cochin-China Govt without reference to referendum. However, they argue no reason why French Viet Nam negotiations should decide future without reference to other states and that necessary atmosphere for referendum is lacking (latter probably true as any referendum under existing conditions might well increase partisan activities). Unquestionably both officials are less liberal in views re native peoples than when first came to French Indochina. Next move will be submission Dalat proposals to French Govt and attempt to reconcile proposals with Fontainebleau agenda. However, regardless soundness many these proposals, difficult foresee any great degree success in above so long as Cochin China stays apart from Viet Nam, which is one point of French policy in French Indochina.
- Jean Cedile.↩