No. 68.
Mr. Low to Mr. Fish.
Peking, April 25, 1873. (Received June 21.)
Sir: Referring to my No. 244, of the 29th ultimo, I have now the honor to inclose translation of a note from Prince Kung, in which the response [Page 175] of the Emperor to our request for audience is given, (inclosure No. 1;) also a translation of a letter from the prince and ministers of the yamên, saying that further discussion of the question is necessary, (inclosure No. 2.)
The response of the Emperor is vague and unsatisfactory; but while this is so, I am disposed to regard it as indicating an intention to accede to our demand, in case it cannot be evaded by delay and indirect means. It is evident that the government does not care to take the risk of a positive refusal.
With a view of ascertaining the exact meaning of the imperial rescript, the foreign representatives addressed a note to the prince, on the 19th instant, saying that they proposed going to the yamên, on the 21st, to meet him, or whoever he might depute, when they would be prepared to discuss and settle all minor points of etiquette. The note was intended to convey the impression that we considered the main point in former discussions—genuflection—conceded and settled. On the day named the ministers of Russia, England, and France met the grand secretary and most of the ministers of the yamên.
Having met with a severe accident a few days previous, which confined me to my rooms, I was unable to accompany them; and the German minister, having left Peking for Berlin on account of ill health, was absent also. I should remark, in this connection, that the Russian minister returned from Shanghai on the 18th instant. So there are still four of the five signatories of the collective note now in Peking.
The discussion lasted four hours, and was, on the whole, not unsatisfactory. From the reports made to me by my colleagues, I infer that it has been decided to grant the audience in case the government finds no indirect means of preventing it. They will, however, be anxious to continue the discussion and thus gain time, hoping that something may occur to break the solidarity of the action of the foreign ministers.
A memorandum of the proceedings at the last conference has been promised me, but I have failed to get it in season for this mail. It will be sent in a future dispatch.
Altogether, the matter looks better than it did at the date of my last communication.
I have, &c.,