The Ambassador in Great Britain ( Page ) to the Secretary of State

No. 450]

Sir: Referring to your cablegram of September 3 [2], by which I was instructed to present to the British Foreign Office an appeal on behalf of the Western Union Telegraph Company in reference to the British censorship regulations as to addresses upon cablegrams, I have the honor to enclose here with a copy of a memorandum from [Page 510] His Majesty’s Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, in reply to my memorandum of September 3 bringing his attention to the substance of the above-mentioned cablegram from the Department.

I have [etc.]

Walter Hines Page

[Enclosure]

The British Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs ( Grey ) to the American Ambassador ( Page )

The Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs presents his compliments to the United States Ambassador, and, with reference to the Embassy’s memorandum of the 3rd instant on the subject of the British censorship regulations, has the honour to inform his excellency that he has caused enquiries to be made in respect of the points raised by the Western Union Telegraph Company.

The question of code addresses in plain language telegrams is more complicated than at first sight would appear. Although it is true that so long as any individual or firm is only allowed to register one code address, the possibility of abuse is almost eliminated, yet when, as in the United States, there is no limit to the number of code words that may be registered for the same address, this latitude could easily be adapted to the surreptitious conveyance of information.

The matter is, however, engaging the attention of the competent British authorities with a view to the discovery of some safe means of giving the mercantile community the relief desired.