R: I wanted to talk about that goddam
message from our people in Dacca.22. See Document 19. Did you see it?
K: No.
R: It's miserable. They bitched about
our policy and have given it lots of distribution so it will probably leak.
It's inexcusable.
K: And it will probably get to Ted
Kennedy.
R: I am sure it will.
K: Somebody gives him cables. I have
had him call me about them.
R: It's a terrible telegram. Couldn't
be worse—says we failed to defend American lives and are morally
bankrupt.
K: Blood did that?
R: Quite a few of them signed it. You
know we are doing everything we can about it. Trying to get the telegrams
back as many as we can. We are going to get a message back to them.
R: If you can keep it from him I will
appreciate it. In the first place I think we have made a good choice.
K: The Chinese haven't said
anything.
R: They talk about condemning
atrocities. There are pictures of the East Pakistanis murdering people.
K: Yes. There was one of an East
Pakistani holding a head. Do you remember when they said there were 1000
bodies and they had the graves and then we couldn't find 20?
R: To me it is outrageous they would
send this.
K: Unless it hits the wires I will
hold it. I will not forward it.
R: We should get our answers out at
the same time the stories come out.
3 Reference is to the speech Nixon delivered to the nation on April 7 on the
situation in Southeast Asia. For text, see Public
Papers: Nixon, 1971, pp.
522–527.
4 In his memoirs Kissinger writes that the dissent cable from Dacca
pointed up a dilemma for the administration. “The United States could
not condone a brutal military repression,” and there was “no doubt about
the strong-arm tactics of the Pakistani military.” He explains the
administration's decision not to react publicly to the military
repression in East Pakistan as necessary to protect “our sole channel to
China.” As a result of the cable, President Nixon ordered Consul General Archer Blood transferred from Dacca. Kissinger conceded that “there was some
merit to the charge of moral insensitivity.” (White
House Years, p. 854)